BackPower Construction of China, Ltd Overview

Power Construction of China, Ltd Goodwill

Track Power Construction of China, Ltd's goodwill ($370M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Goodwill
$369.72M
↑ 0.00% YoYΔ $0.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Power Construction of China, Ltd Goodwill History

Loading

Power Construction of China, Ltd vs. peers: Goodwill Comparison

Loading

Power Construction of China, Ltd Goodwill Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Power Construction of China, Ltd (601669.SS) FAQ

Power Construction of China, Ltd posts a goodwill of $370M as of June 2026. That compares with $370M in the prior-year period — up 0.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Power Construction of China, Ltd's goodwill was $370M. The latest reading is $370M — essentially flat versus a year earlier (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Goodwill is one piece of Power Construction of China, Ltd's financial statement story. At $370M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 601669.SS's goodwill usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Power Construction of China, Ltd's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Power Construction of China, Ltd against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in goodwill easier to interpret. Start with $370M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.