BackChina Aerospace Times Electronics Ltd. Overview

China Aerospace Times Electronics Ltd. Receivables

Track China Aerospace Times Electronics Ltd.'s receivables ($11B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$11.29B
↑ 4.92% YoYΔ $529.77M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

China Aerospace Times Electronics Ltd. Receivables History

Loading

China Aerospace Times Electronics Ltd. vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

China Aerospace Times Electronics Ltd. Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China Aerospace Times Electronics Ltd. (600879.SS) FAQ

As of the most recent data (June 2026), 600879.SS shows a receivables of $11B. That compares with $11B in the prior-year period — up 4.9% year over year. Scroll down for historical charts and peer comparison views.

Compared with the year-ago period, 600879.SS's receivables is now $11B (was $11B) — a 4.9% year-over-year increase. Pairing that YoY change with peer averages gives a clearer picture of whether China Aerospace Times Electronics Ltd. is outperforming or lagging.

Tracking 600879.SS's receivables over time shows whether China Aerospace Times Electronics Ltd. is scaling, shrinking, or reshaping that part of the business. The current reading is $11B That compares with $11B in the prior-year period — up 4.9% year over year. Multi-quarter patterns matter more than any single print, which is why this page emphasizes history and peer comparison charts.

Besides this receivables page, Stockcircle has China Aerospace Times Electronics Ltd.'s full stock overview, other financial metrics, insider and congress trade tabs, and tools to follow the stock. Together they help you connect receivables (currently $11B) with ownership activity and broader fundamentals.

China Aerospace Times Electronics Ltd.'s receivables is $11B; compare it with other Technology names on the peer chart. Typical ranges vary by sub-industry, so always sanity-check against the closest competitors, not just the whole sector bucket.