BackShanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd. Overview

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd. Inventory

Track Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd.'s inventory ($1.4B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Inventory
$1.38B
↑ 1.95% YoYΔ $26.39M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd. Inventory History

Loading

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd. vs. peers: Inventory Comparison

Loading

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd. Inventory Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd. (600819.SS) FAQ

Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd. posts a inventory of $1.4B as of June 2026. That compares with $1.4B in the prior-year period — up 1.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd.'s inventory was $1.4B. The latest reading is $1.4B — a 1.9% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Inventory is one piece of Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $1.4B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 600819.SS's inventory usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Shanghai Yaohua Pilkington Glass Group , Ltd. against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in inventory easier to interpret. Start with $1.4B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.