BackShanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd. Overview

Shanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd. Receivables

Shanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd.'s receivables is $1.2B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$1.19B
↑ 72.95% YoYΔ $501.25M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Shanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd. Receivables History

Loading

Shanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd. vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Shanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd. Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Shanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd. (600508.SS) FAQ

Shanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd. posts a receivables of $1.2B as of June 2026. That compares with $690M in the prior-year period — up 73.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Shanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd.'s receivables was $690M. The latest reading is $1.2B — a 73.0% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Shanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $1.2B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 600508.SS's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Shanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Shanghai Datun Energy Resources , Ltd. against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $1.2B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.