BackNingxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd Overview

Ningxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd Inventory

Ningxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd's inventory is $260M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Inventory
$261.21M
↓ 11.72% YoYΔ $-34.68M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Ningxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd Inventory History

Loading

Ningxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd vs. peers: Inventory Comparison

Loading

Ningxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd Inventory Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Ningxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd (600449.SS) FAQ

Ningxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd posts a inventory of $260M as of June 2026. That compares with $300M in the prior-year period — down 11.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Ningxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd's inventory was $300M. The latest reading is $260M — a 11.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Inventory is one piece of Ningxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd's financial statement story. At $260M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 600449.SS's inventory usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Ningxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Ningxia Building Materials Group ,Ltd against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in inventory easier to interpret. Start with $260M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.