BackShanghai Construction Group , Ltd. Overview

Shanghai Construction Group , Ltd. Inventory

Track Shanghai Construction Group , Ltd.'s inventory ($46B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Inventory
$46.36B
↓ 24.40% YoYΔ $-14.96B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Shanghai Construction Group , Ltd. Inventory History

Loading

Shanghai Construction Group , Ltd. vs. peers: Inventory Comparison

Loading

Shanghai Construction Group , Ltd. Inventory Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Shanghai Construction Group , Ltd. (600170.SS) FAQ

Shanghai Construction Group , Ltd. posts a inventory of $46B as of June 2026. That compares with $61B in the prior-year period — down 24.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Shanghai Construction Group , Ltd.'s inventory was $61B. The latest reading is $46B — a 24.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Inventory is one piece of Shanghai Construction Group , Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $46B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 600170.SS's inventory usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Shanghai Construction Group , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Shanghai Construction Group , Ltd. against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in inventory easier to interpret. Start with $46B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.