BackG&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd. Overview

G&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd. Receivables

Track G&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd.'s receivables ($14M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$14.01M
↓ 46.50% YoYΔ $-12.18M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

G&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd. Receivables History

Loading

G&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd. vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

G&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd. Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

G&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd. (4911.TWO) FAQ

G&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd. posts a receivables of $14M as of June 2026. That compares with $26M in the prior-year period — down 46.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, G&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd.'s receivables was $26M. The latest reading is $14M — a 46.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of G&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $14M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 4911.TWO's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; G&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging G&E Herbal Biotechnology , Ltd. against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $14M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.