BackTian Cheng Holdings Limited Overview

Tian Cheng Holdings Limited Current Assets

Track Tian Cheng Holdings Limited's current assets ($48M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Assets
$47.79M
↓ 23.35% YoYΔ $-14.56M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Tian Cheng Holdings Limited Current Assets History

Loading

Tian Cheng Holdings Limited vs. peers: Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Tian Cheng Holdings Limited Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Tian Cheng Holdings Limited (2110.HK) FAQ

Tian Cheng Holdings Limited posts a current assets of $48M as of May 2026. That compares with $62M in the prior-year period — down 23.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Tian Cheng Holdings Limited's current assets was $62M. The latest reading is $48M — a 23.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Assets is one piece of Tian Cheng Holdings Limited's financial statement story. At $48M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 2110.HK's current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Tian Cheng Holdings Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Tian Cheng Holdings Limited against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in current assets easier to interpret. Start with $48M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.