BackChampion Building Materials , Ltd. Overview

Champion Building Materials , Ltd. Inventory

Track Champion Building Materials , Ltd.'s inventory ($1.2B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Inventory
$1.15B
↑ 26.43% YoYΔ $240.58M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Champion Building Materials , Ltd. Inventory History

Loading

Champion Building Materials , Ltd. vs. peers: Inventory Comparison

Loading

Champion Building Materials , Ltd. Inventory Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Champion Building Materials , Ltd. (1806.TW) FAQ

Champion Building Materials , Ltd. posts a inventory of $1.2B as of June 2026. That compares with $910M in the prior-year period — up 26.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Champion Building Materials , Ltd.'s inventory was $910M. The latest reading is $1.2B — a 26.4% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Inventory is one piece of Champion Building Materials , Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $1.2B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 1806.TW's inventory usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Champion Building Materials , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Champion Building Materials , Ltd. against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in inventory easier to interpret. Start with $1.2B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.