BackInformation Strategy & Technology , Ltd. Overview

Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd. Receivables

Track Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd.'s receivables ($970M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$966.12M
↑ 19.57% YoYΔ $158.12M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd. Receivables History

Loading

Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd. vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd. Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd. (155A.T) FAQ

Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd. posts a receivables of $970M as of June 2026. That compares with $810M in the prior-year period — up 19.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd.'s receivables was $810M. The latest reading is $970M — a 19.6% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $970M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 155A.T's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd. against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $970M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.