BackVodafone Group Public Limited Company Overview

Vodafone Group Public Limited Company Goodwill

Latest goodwill for 0LQQ.L: $22B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Goodwill
$21.94B
↑ 6.96% YoYΔ $1.43B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Vodafone Group Public Limited Company Goodwill History

Loading

Vodafone Group Public Limited Company vs. peers: Goodwill Comparison

Loading

Vodafone Group Public Limited Company Goodwill Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Vodafone Group Public Limited Company (0LQQ.L) FAQ

Vodafone Group Public Limited Company posts a goodwill of $22B as of March 2026. That compares with $21B in the prior-year period — up 7.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Vodafone Group Public Limited Company's goodwill was $21B. The latest reading is $22B — a 7.0% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Goodwill is one piece of Vodafone Group Public Limited Company's financial statement story. At $22B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 0LQQ.L's goodwill usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Vodafone Group Public Limited Company's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Vodafone Group Public Limited Company against Telecommunications peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Telecommunications are more comparable, which makes gaps in goodwill easier to interpret. Start with $22B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.