BackKT Overview

KT Inventory

Track KT's inventory ($630B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Inventory
$625.70B
↑ 40.96% YoYΔ $181.80B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

KT Inventory History

Loading

KT vs. peers: Inventory Comparison

Loading

KT Inventory Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

KT (030200.KS) FAQ

KT posts a inventory of $630B as of June 2026. That compares with $440B in the prior-year period — up 41.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, KT's inventory was $440B. The latest reading is $630B — a 41.0% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Inventory is one piece of KT's financial statement story. At $630B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 030200.KS's inventory usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; KT's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging KT against Telecommunications peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Telecommunications are more comparable, which makes gaps in inventory easier to interpret. Start with $630B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.