BackMicrolink Solutions Berhad Overview

Microlink Solutions Berhad Current Assets

Track Microlink Solutions Berhad's current assets ($230M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Assets
$232.59M
↑ 65.30% YoYΔ $91.88M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Microlink Solutions Berhad Current Assets History

Loading

Microlink Solutions Berhad vs. peers: Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Microlink Solutions Berhad Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Microlink Solutions Berhad (0126.KL) FAQ

Microlink Solutions Berhad posts a current assets of $230M as of June 2026. That compares with $140M in the prior-year period — up 65.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Microlink Solutions Berhad's current assets was $140M. The latest reading is $230M — a 65.3% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Assets is one piece of Microlink Solutions Berhad's financial statement story. At $230M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for 0126.KL's current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Microlink Solutions Berhad's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Microlink Solutions Berhad against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in current assets easier to interpret. Start with $230M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.