BackWal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV Overview

Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV Net Tangible Assets

Track Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV's net tangible assets ($240B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$238.61B
9.69% YoYΔ $21.07B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV (WMMVF) FAQ

Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV posts a net tangible assets of $240B as of June 2026. That compares with $220B in the prior-year period — up 9.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV's net tangible assets was $220B. The latest reading is $240B — a 9.7% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV's financial statement story. At $240B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for WMMVF's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $240B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.