BackWeatherford International plc Overview

Weatherford International plc Total Current Liabilities

Track Weatherford International plc's total current liabilities ($630M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$625.00M

Peer average

Loading

Weatherford International plc Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Weatherford International plc vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Weatherford International plc Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Weatherford International plc (WFRD) FAQ

Weatherford International plc posts a total current liabilities of $630M as of June 2026. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Weatherford International plc's total current liabilities was $0. The latest reading is $630M (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Weatherford International plc's financial statement story. At $630M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for WFRD's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Weatherford International plc's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Weatherford International plc against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $630M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.