BackWestern Midstream Partners LP - Unit Overview

Western Midstream Partners LP - Unit Other Current Liabilities

Track Western Midstream Partners LP - Unit's other current liabilities ($300M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$302.71M
43.50% YoYΔ $91.76M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Western Midstream Partners LP - Unit Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Western Midstream Partners LP - Unit vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Western Midstream Partners LP - Unit Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Western Midstream Partners LP - Unit (WES) FAQ

Western Midstream Partners LP - Unit posts a other current liabilities of $300M as of June 2026. That compares with $210M in the prior-year period — up 43.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Western Midstream Partners LP - Unit's other current liabilities was $210M. The latest reading is $300M — a 43.5% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Western Midstream Partners LP - Unit's financial statement story. At $300M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for WES's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Western Midstream Partners LP - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Western Midstream Partners LP - Unit against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $300M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.