BackTeva- Pharmaceutical Industries Overview

Teva- Pharmaceutical Industries Intangible Assets

Teva- Pharmaceutical Industries's intangible assets is $3.4B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Intangible Assets
$3.45B
16.78% YoYΔ $-695.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Teva- Pharmaceutical Industries Intangible Assets History

Loading

Teva- Pharmaceutical Industries vs. peers: Intangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Teva- Pharmaceutical Industries Intangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Teva- Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) FAQ

Teva- Pharmaceutical Industries posts a intangible assets of $3.4B as of June 2026. That compares with $4.1B in the prior-year period — down 16.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Teva- Pharmaceutical Industries's intangible assets was $4.1B. The latest reading is $3.4B — a 16.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Intangible Assets is one piece of Teva- Pharmaceutical Industries's financial statement story. At $3.4B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for TEVA's intangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Teva- Pharmaceutical Industries's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Teva- Pharmaceutical Industries against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in intangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $3.4B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.