BackTrip.com Group Overview
Trip.com Group Ltd - ADR

Trip.com Group Debt to Equity

Latest debt-to-equity ratio for Trip.com Group: 0.3 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Debt to Equity

0.30

Debt to Equity

0.30

Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.

Debt to Equity (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Debt to Equity History

Loading

Debt to Equity Comparison

Loading

Trip.com Group (TCOM) FAQ

Trip.com Group posts a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.3. That is above the Consumer Staples sector average of -0.88. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Staples stocks, a debt-to-equity ratio near -0.88 is typical. Trip.com Group's 0.3 is higher that level. That is roughly 134.7% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Trip.com Group's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.3 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for TCOM's debt-to-equity ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average -0.88), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Trip.com Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Trip.com Group against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in debt-to-equity ratio easier to interpret. Start with 0.3 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.