BackPresidio Property Trust- Warrants (24/01/2027) Overview

Presidio Property Trust- Warrants (24/01/2027) Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for SQFTW: $21M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$21.42M
27.07% YoYΔ $-7.95M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Presidio Property Trust- Warrants (24/01/2027) Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Presidio Property Trust- Warrants (24/01/2027) vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Presidio Property Trust- Warrants (24/01/2027) Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Presidio Property Trust- Warrants (24/01/2027) (SQFTW) FAQ

Presidio Property Trust- Warrants (24/01/2027) posts a net tangible assets of $21M as of June 2026. That compares with $29M in the prior-year period — down 27.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Presidio Property Trust- Warrants (24/01/2027)'s net tangible assets was $29M. The latest reading is $21M — a 27.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Presidio Property Trust- Warrants (24/01/2027)'s financial statement story. At $21M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SQFTW's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Presidio Property Trust- Warrants (24/01/2027)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Presidio Property Trust- Warrants (24/01/2027) against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $21M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.