BackPIMCO US Stocks PLUS Active Bond Exchange Traded Fund Overview

PIMCO US Stocks PLUS Active Bond Exchange Traded Fund Net Income

Latest net income for SPLS: $430M, above the sector sector average of $130M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Net Income

$55.00M
107.18% YoY

As of Jul 2017

Annual Net Income (TTM)

$426.00M
170.65% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Jul 2017

Average Net Income (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Net Income History

Loading

Net Income Comparison

Loading

Annual Net Income Growth Rate (%)

Loading...

Annual Net Income Growth (Absolute)

Loading...

PIMCO US Stocks PLUS Active Bond Exchange Traded Fund (SPLS) FAQ

PIMCO US Stocks PLUS Active Bond Exchange Traded Fund's net income stands at $430M as of July 2017. That compares with $-600M in the prior-year period — up 170.6% year over year. That is above the sector sector average of $130M. Stockcircle updates this page with the newest filings so you can track how the metric evolves quarter by quarter.

PIMCO US Stocks PLUS Active Bond Exchange Traded Fund reported $430M in net income versus $-600M a year earlier — a 170.6% year-over-year increase. The historical chart on this page makes it easier to see whether that move is part of a longer pattern.

PIMCO US Stocks PLUS Active Bond Exchange Traded Fund sits higher the its sector benchmark ($130M) with a net income of $430M. That is roughly 224.6% above the sector mean. Peer context matters because what looks expensive or cheap in absolute terms can be normal for the sector.

That compares with $-600M in the prior-year period — up 170.6% year over year. Sustained growth in net income can support a stronger franchise, while sharp declines may reflect divestitures, weaker demand, or accounting changes. Always read YoY moves with the footnotes of recent filings in mind.

The history chart shows how PIMCO US Stocks PLUS Active Bond Exchange Traded Fund's net income evolved across reporting periods, while the comparison chart places SPLS next to similar companies. Use both: a rising metric that still lags peers tells a different story than a rising metric that already leads the group. Growth charts, when available, highlight acceleration or slowdown.