BackSharonAI Holdings Class A Common Stock Overview

SharonAI Holdings Class A Common Stock Receivables

Latest receivables for SHAZ: $28M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$28.46M
9325.35% YoYΔ $28.16M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

SharonAI Holdings Class A Common Stock Receivables History

Loading

SharonAI Holdings Class A Common Stock vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

SharonAI Holdings Class A Common Stock Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

SharonAI Holdings Class A Common Stock (SHAZ) FAQ

SharonAI Holdings Class A Common Stock posts a receivables of $28M as of June 2026. That compares with $300K in the prior-year period — up 9325.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, SharonAI Holdings Class A Common Stock's receivables was $300K. The latest reading is $28M — a 9325.4% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of SharonAI Holdings Class A Common Stock's financial statement story. At $28M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SHAZ's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; SharonAI Holdings Class A Common Stock's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging SharonAI Holdings Class A Common Stock against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $28M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.