BackSafe & Green Holdings Overview

Safe & Green Holdings Net Tangible Assets

Track Safe & Green Holdings's net tangible assets ($19M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$19.36M
18.44% YoYΔ $-4.38M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Safe & Green Holdings Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Safe & Green Holdings vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Safe & Green Holdings Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Safe & Green Holdings (SGBX) FAQ

Safe & Green Holdings posts a net tangible assets of $19M as of June 2026. That compares with $24M in the prior-year period — down 18.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Safe & Green Holdings's net tangible assets was $24M. The latest reading is $19M — a 18.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Safe & Green Holdings's financial statement story. At $19M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SGBX's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Safe & Green Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Safe & Green Holdings against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $19M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.