BackSignature Bank - 5% PRF PERPETUAL USD - 1/40TH Ser A Overview

Signature Bank - 5% PRF PERPETUAL USD - 1/40TH Ser A Current Assets

Latest current assets for SBNYP: $110B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Assets
$107.73B
7.94% YoYΔ $-9.29B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Signature Bank - 5% PRF PERPETUAL USD - 1/40TH Ser A Current Assets History

Loading

Signature Bank - 5% PRF PERPETUAL USD - 1/40TH Ser A vs. peers: Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Signature Bank - 5% PRF PERPETUAL USD - 1/40TH Ser A Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Signature Bank - 5% PRF PERPETUAL USD - 1/40TH Ser A (SBNYP) FAQ

Signature Bank - 5% PRF PERPETUAL USD - 1/40TH Ser A posts a current assets of $110B as of December 2022. That compares with $120B in the prior-year period — down 7.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Signature Bank - 5% PRF PERPETUAL USD - 1/40TH Ser A's current assets was $120B. The latest reading is $110B — a 7.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Assets is one piece of Signature Bank - 5% PRF PERPETUAL USD - 1/40TH Ser A's financial statement story. At $110B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SBNYP's current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Signature Bank - 5% PRF PERPETUAL USD - 1/40TH Ser A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Signature Bank - 5% PRF PERPETUAL USD - 1/40TH Ser A against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in current assets easier to interpret. Start with $110B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.