BackSaratoga Investment - 6% NT REDEEM 30/04/2027 USD 25 Overview

Saratoga Investment - 6% NT REDEEM 30/04/2027 USD 25 Receivables

Latest receivables for SAT: $9.3M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$9.28M
99.88% YoYΔ $-7.99B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Saratoga Investment - 6% NT REDEEM 30/04/2027 USD 25 Receivables History

Loading

Saratoga Investment - 6% NT REDEEM 30/04/2027 USD 25 vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Saratoga Investment - 6% NT REDEEM 30/04/2027 USD 25 Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Saratoga Investment - 6% NT REDEEM 30/04/2027 USD 25 (SAT) FAQ

Saratoga Investment - 6% NT REDEEM 30/04/2027 USD 25 posts a receivables of $9.3M as of May 2026. That compares with $8B in the prior-year period — down 99.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Saratoga Investment - 6% NT REDEEM 30/04/2027 USD 25's receivables was $8B. The latest reading is $9.3M — a 99.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Saratoga Investment - 6% NT REDEEM 30/04/2027 USD 25's financial statement story. At $9.3M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SAT's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Saratoga Investment - 6% NT REDEEM 30/04/2027 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Saratoga Investment - 6% NT REDEEM 30/04/2027 USD 25 against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $9.3M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.