BackSachem Capital - 6.875% NT REDEEM 30/12/2024 USD 25 Overview

Sachem Capital - 6.875% NT REDEEM 30/12/2024 USD 25 Current Assets

Latest current assets for SACC: $17M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Assets
$17.17M
42.94% YoYΔ $-12.92M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Sachem Capital - 6.875% NT REDEEM 30/12/2024 USD 25 Current Assets History

Loading

Sachem Capital - 6.875% NT REDEEM 30/12/2024 USD 25 vs. peers: Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Sachem Capital - 6.875% NT REDEEM 30/12/2024 USD 25 Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Sachem Capital - 6.875% NT REDEEM 30/12/2024 USD 25 (SACC) FAQ

Sachem Capital - 6.875% NT REDEEM 30/12/2024 USD 25 posts a current assets of $17M as of March 2026. That compares with $30M in the prior-year period — down 42.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Sachem Capital - 6.875% NT REDEEM 30/12/2024 USD 25's current assets was $30M. The latest reading is $17M — a 42.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Assets is one piece of Sachem Capital - 6.875% NT REDEEM 30/12/2024 USD 25's financial statement story. At $17M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SACC's current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Sachem Capital - 6.875% NT REDEEM 30/12/2024 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Sachem Capital - 6.875% NT REDEEM 30/12/2024 USD 25 against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in current assets easier to interpret. Start with $17M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.