BackReading International Overview

Reading International Other Current Liabilities

Track Reading International's other current liabilities ($64M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$63.61M
8.60% YoYΔ $5.04M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Reading International Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Reading International vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Reading International Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Reading International (RDI) FAQ

Reading International posts a other current liabilities of $64M as of March 2026. That compares with $59M in the prior-year period — up 8.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Reading International's other current liabilities was $59M. The latest reading is $64M — a 8.6% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Reading International's financial statement story. At $64M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RDI's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Reading International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Reading International against Telecommunications peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Telecommunications are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $64M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.