BackUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Overview

Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Net Tangible Assets

Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical's net tangible assets is $-280M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-284.00M
279.42% YoYΔ $-442.29M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical (RARE) FAQ

Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical posts a net tangible assets of $-280M as of June 2026. That compares with $160M in the prior-year period — down 279.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical's net tangible assets was $160M. The latest reading is $-280M — a 279.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical's financial statement story. At $-280M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RARE's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-280M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.