BackParkerVision Overview
ParkerVision, Inc.

ParkerVision Debt to Equity

Latest debt-to-equity ratio for ParkerVision: -0.05 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Debt to Equity

-0.05

Debt to Equity

-0.05

Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.

Debt to Equity (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Debt to Equity History

Loading

Debt to Equity Comparison

Loading

ParkerVision (PRKR) FAQ

ParkerVision (PRKR) currently reports a debt-to-equity ratio of -0.05. That is below the Technology sector average of 0.36. Use the charts on this page to explore ParkerVision's debt-to-equity ratio history and peer comparisons.

ParkerVision's debt-to-equity ratio of -0.05 is lower than the Technology sector average of 0.36. That is roughly 114.3% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The debt-to-equity ratio is a valuation multiple that relates ParkerVision's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At -0.05, PRKR can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Technology peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current debt-to-equity ratio of -0.05, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Technology average is 0.36. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for ParkerVision, and consider following PRKR for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

ParkerVision is classified in the Technology sector. On debt-to-equity ratio, it currently shows -0.05 versus a sector average near 0.36. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Technology are usually more informative than comparing PRKR with unrelated industries.