BackAMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Overview

AMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Net Tangible Assets

Track AMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's net tangible assets ($230M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$234.96M
5.82% YoYΔ $12.93M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

AMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

AMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

AMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

AMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (POWWP) FAQ

AMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A posts a net tangible assets of $230M as of March 2026. That compares with $220M in the prior-year period — up 5.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, AMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's net tangible assets was $220M. The latest reading is $230M — a 5.8% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of AMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's financial statement story. At $230M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for POWWP's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; AMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging AMMO- 8.75% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $230M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.