BackPing AN Insurance (Group) of China, Ltd. Overview

Ping AN Insurance (Group) of China, Ltd. Receivables

Latest receivables for PNGAY: $73B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$73.45B
73.25% YoYΔ $-201.15B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Ping AN Insurance (Group) of China, Ltd. Receivables History

Loading

Ping AN Insurance (Group) of China, Ltd. vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Ping AN Insurance (Group) of China, Ltd. Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Ping AN Insurance (Group) of China, Ltd. (PNGAY) FAQ

Ping AN Insurance (Group) of China, Ltd. posts a receivables of $73B as of June 2026. That compares with $270B in the prior-year period — down 73.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Ping AN Insurance (Group) of China, Ltd.'s receivables was $270B. The latest reading is $73B — a 73.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Ping AN Insurance (Group) of China, Ltd.'s financial statement story. At $73B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PNGAY's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Ping AN Insurance (Group) of China, Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Ping AN Insurance (Group) of China, Ltd. against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $73B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.