BackProspect Capital Notes 2018-15.06.29 Lkd to Rating Changes Overview

Prospect Capital Notes 2018-15.06.29 Lkd to Rating Changes Operating Income

Prospect Capital Notes 2018-15.06.29 Lkd to Rating Changes's operating income is $-97M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Operating Income

N/A

As of Mar 31, 2026

Annual Operating Income (TTM)

$-96501000.00
323.57% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Mar 31, 2026

Average Operating Income (Comparison Companies)

Operating Income History

Operating Income Comparison

Annual Operating Income Growth Rate (%)

Annual Operating Income Growth (Absolute)

Prospect Capital Notes 2018-15.06.29 Lkd to Rating Changes (PBC) FAQ

Prospect Capital Notes 2018-15.06.29 Lkd to Rating Changes posts a operating income of $-97M as of March 2026. That compares with $43M in the prior-year period — down 323.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Prospect Capital Notes 2018-15.06.29 Lkd to Rating Changes's operating income was $43M. The latest reading is $-97M — a 323.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Operating Income is one piece of Prospect Capital Notes 2018-15.06.29 Lkd to Rating Changes's financial statement story. At $-97M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PBC's operating income usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Prospect Capital Notes 2018-15.06.29 Lkd to Rating Changes's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Prospect Capital Notes 2018-15.06.29 Lkd to Rating Changes against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in operating income easier to interpret. Start with $-97M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.