BackPlains GP Holdings LP Overview

Plains GP Holdings LP Total Current Liabilities

Track Plains GP Holdings LP's total current liabilities ($190M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$194.00M
95.83% YoYΔ $-4.45B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Plains GP Holdings LP Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Plains GP Holdings LP vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Plains GP Holdings LP Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Plains GP Holdings LP (PAGP) FAQ

Plains GP Holdings LP posts a total current liabilities of $190M as of June 2026. That compares with $4.6B in the prior-year period — down 95.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Plains GP Holdings LP's total current liabilities was $4.6B. The latest reading is $190M — a 95.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Plains GP Holdings LP's financial statement story. At $190M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PAGP's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Plains GP Holdings LP's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Plains GP Holdings LP against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $190M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.