BackOxford Lane Capital - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser 2029 Overview

Oxford Lane Capital - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser 2029 Receivables

Latest receivables for OXLCO: $22M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$21.56M
12.52% YoYΔ $-3.09M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Oxford Lane Capital - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser 2029 Receivables History

Loading

Oxford Lane Capital - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser 2029 vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Oxford Lane Capital - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser 2029 Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Oxford Lane Capital - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser 2029 (OXLCO) FAQ

Oxford Lane Capital - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser 2029 posts a receivables of $22M as of March 2026. That compares with $25M in the prior-year period — down 12.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Oxford Lane Capital - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser 2029's receivables was $25M. The latest reading is $22M — a 12.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Oxford Lane Capital - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser 2029's financial statement story. At $22M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for OXLCO's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Oxford Lane Capital - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser 2029's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Oxford Lane Capital - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser 2029 against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $22M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.