BackOsisko Gold Royalties Overview
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd

Osisko Gold Royalties PEG Ratio

Latest PEG ratio for Osisko Gold Royalties: 13.79 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

13.79

PEG Ratio

13.79

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

Average PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Osisko Gold Royalties (OR) FAQ

Osisko Gold Royalties (OR) currently reports a PEG ratio of 13.79. That is above the Materials sector average of 10.8. Use the charts on this page to explore Osisko Gold Royalties's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.

Osisko Gold Royalties's PEG ratio of 13.79 is higher than the Materials sector average of 10.8. That is roughly 27.7% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Osisko Gold Royalties's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 13.79, OR can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Materials peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current PEG ratio of 13.79, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Materials average is 10.8. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Osisko Gold Royalties, and consider following OR for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Osisko Gold Royalties is classified in the Materials sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows 13.79 versus a sector average near 10.8. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing OR with unrelated industries.