BackOneSmart International Education Group Overview
OneSmart International Education Group Ltd - ADR

OneSmart International Education Group Return on Equity

Valuation check: ONE's ROE is 153.34%, above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 21.77%.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

15333.71%

Return on Equity

15333.71%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

Average ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

OneSmart International Education Group (ONE) FAQ

OneSmart International Education Group posts a ROE of 153.34%. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 21.77%. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Discretionary stocks, a ROE near 21.77% is typical. OneSmart International Education Group's 153.34% is higher that level. That is roughly 70325.1% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

OneSmart International Education Group's ROE moves when the underlying profit, equity, or asset base changes. Cost cuts, pricing power, buybacks, write-downs, and cyclical swings can all shift the percentage. The latest reading is 153.34%; use YoY and peer views to separate noise from signal.

Context for ONE's ROE usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 21.77%), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; OneSmart International Education Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging OneSmart International Education Group against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in ROE easier to interpret. Start with 153.34% here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.