BackNew York Times Overview

New York Times Receivables

New York Times's receivables is $240M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$236.03M
↑ 11.82% YoYΔ $24.95M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

New York Times Receivables History

Loading

New York Times vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

New York Times Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

New York Times (NYT) FAQ

As of the most recent data (June 2026), NYT shows a receivables of $240M. That compares with $210M in the prior-year period — up 11.8% year over year. Scroll down for historical charts and peer comparison views.

Compared with the year-ago period, NYT's receivables is now $240M (was $210M) — a 11.8% year-over-year increase. Pairing that YoY change with peer averages gives a clearer picture of whether New York Times is outperforming or lagging.

Tracking NYT's receivables over time shows whether New York Times is scaling, shrinking, or reshaping that part of the business. The current reading is $240M That compares with $210M in the prior-year period — up 11.8% year over year. Multi-quarter patterns matter more than any single print, which is why this page emphasizes history and peer comparison charts.

Besides this receivables page, Stockcircle has New York Times's full stock overview, other financial metrics, insider and congress trade tabs, and tools to follow the stock. Together they help you connect receivables (currently $240M) with ownership activity and broader fundamentals.

New York Times's receivables is $240M; compare it with other Telecommunications names on the peer chart. Typical ranges vary by sub-industry, so always sanity-check against the closest competitors, not just the whole sector bucket.