BackNavitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026) Overview

Navitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026) Long Term Debt

Track Navitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026)'s long-term debt ($3M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$2.97M
44.31% YoYΔ $-2.36M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Navitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026) Long Term Debt History

Loading

Navitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026) vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Navitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026) Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Navitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026) (NVTSW) FAQ

Navitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026) posts a long-term debt of $3M as of June 2026. That compares with $5.3M in the prior-year period — down 44.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Navitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026)'s long-term debt was $5.3M. The latest reading is $3M — a 44.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Navitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026)'s financial statement story. At $3M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NVTSW's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Navitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Navitas Semiconductor - Warrants(19/10/2026) against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $3M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.