BackArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III Overview

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III Long Term Debt

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's long-term debt is $11B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$10.94B
27.38% YoYΔ $2.35B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III Long Term Debt History

Loading

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III (MT) FAQ

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III posts a long-term debt of $11B as of March 2026. That compares with $8.6B in the prior-year period — up 27.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's long-term debt was $8.6B. The latest reading is $11B — a 27.4% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's financial statement story. At $11B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MT's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $11B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.