Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow18.04%
Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) currently reports a ROE of 18.04%. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 23.23%. Use the charts on this page to explore Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions's ROE history and peer comparisons.
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions's ROE of 18.04% is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 23.23%. That is roughly 22.4% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.
There is no universal 'good' ROE, but Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions's current 18.04% should be judged against Consumer Discretionary norms (sector average: 23.23%) and against ML.PA's own history. Strong, stable readings often indicate durable competitive advantage; volatile or declining ones deserve a closer look at margins and capital efficiency.
Start with the current ROE of 18.04%, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 23.23%. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions, and consider following ML.PA for alerts when major investors trade the stock.
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On ROE, it currently shows 18.04% versus a sector average near 23.23%. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing ML.PA with unrelated industries.