BackMIND Technology- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Overview

MIND Technology- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Total Revenue

Track MIND Technology- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's total revenue ($35M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Revenue

$5.62M
171.15% YoY

As of Jul 2026

Annual Revenue (TTM)

$34.78M
131.18% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Jul 2026

Average Revenue (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Total Revenue History

Loading

Total Revenue Comparison

Loading

Annual Revenue Growth Rate (%)

Loading

Annual Revenue Growth (Absolute)

Loading

MIND Technology- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (MINDP) FAQ

MIND Technology- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's total revenue stands at $35M as of July 2026. That compares with $15M in the prior-year period — up 131.2% year over year. That is below the Industrials sector average of $380B. Stockcircle updates this page with the newest filings so you can track how the metric evolves quarter by quarter.

MIND Technology- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A reported $35M in total revenue versus $15M a year earlier — a 131.2% year-over-year increase. The historical chart on this page makes it easier to see whether that move is part of a longer pattern.

MIND Technology- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A sits lower the Industrials benchmark ($380B) with a total revenue of $35M. That is roughly 100.0% below the sector mean. Peer context matters because what looks expensive or cheap in absolute terms can be normal for the sector.

That compares with $15M in the prior-year period — up 131.2% year over year. Sustained growth in total revenue can support a stronger franchise, while sharp declines may reflect divestitures, weaker demand, or accounting changes. Always read YoY moves with the footnotes of recent filings in mind.

The history chart shows how MIND Technology- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's total revenue evolved across reporting periods, while the comparison chart places MINDP next to similar companies. Use both: a rising metric that still lags peers tells a different story than a rising metric that already leads the group. Growth charts, when available, highlight acceleration or slowdown.