Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (MGDDF) has a PEG ratio of 17.57, above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 6.41.
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow17.57
The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.
Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (MGDDF) currently reports a PEG ratio of 17.57. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 6.41. Use the charts on this page to explore Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.
Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA's PEG ratio of 17.57 is higher than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 6.41. That is roughly 174.0% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.
The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 17.57, MGDDF can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.
Start with the current PEG ratio of 17.57, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 6.41. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA, and consider following MGDDF for alerts when major investors trade the stock.
Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows 17.57 versus a sector average near 6.41. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing MGDDF with unrelated industries.