BackManchester United Plc. Overview
Manchester United Plc. - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Manchester United Plc. PEG Ratio

Latest PEG ratio for Manchester United Plc.: -48.54 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

-48.54

PEG Ratio

-48.54

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

Average PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Manchester United Plc. (MANU) FAQ

Manchester United Plc. posts a PEG ratio of -48.54. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 5.5. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Discretionary stocks, a PEG ratio near 5.5 is typical. Manchester United Plc.'s -48.54 is lower that level. That is roughly 982.9% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Manchester United Plc.'s PEG ratio of -48.54 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for MANU's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 5.5), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Manchester United Plc.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Manchester United Plc. against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with -48.54 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.