BackLexicon Pharmaceuticals Overview

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals Common Stock

Latest common stock for LXRX: $440M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Common Stock
$444.96M
↑ 121472.68% YoYΔ $444.59M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals Common Stock History

Loading

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals vs. peers: Common Stock Comparison

Loading

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals Common Stock Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company). Positive growth indicates new issuance/dilution; negative growth indicates reductions/buybacks.

Loading

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals (LXRX) FAQ

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals posts a common stock of $440M as of September 2026. That compares with $370K in the prior-year period — up 121472.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals's common stock was $370K. The latest reading is $440M — a 121472.7% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Common Stock is one piece of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals's financial statement story. At $440M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LXRX's common stock usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Lexicon Pharmaceuticals's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Lexicon Pharmaceuticals against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in common stock easier to interpret. Start with $440M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.