BackLas Vegas Sands Overview
Las Vegas Sands Corp

Las Vegas Sands P/E Ratio

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) has a P/E ratio of 16.62, below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 41.05.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

16.62

P/E Ratio

16.62

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) FAQ

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) currently reports a P/E ratio of 16.62. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 41.05. Use the charts on this page to explore Las Vegas Sands's P/E ratio history and peer comparisons.

Las Vegas Sands's P/E ratio of 16.62 is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 41.05. That is roughly 59.5% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The P/E ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Las Vegas Sands's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 16.62, LVS can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current P/E ratio of 16.62, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 41.05. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Las Vegas Sands, and consider following LVS for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Las Vegas Sands is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On P/E ratio, it currently shows 16.62 versus a sector average near 41.05. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing LVS with unrelated industries.