BackLATAM Airlines Group S.A. Overview
LATAM Airlines Group S.A. - ADR

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. P/E Ratio

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (LTM) has a P/E ratio of 10.47, below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 47.18.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

10.47

P/E Ratio

10.47

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

Average P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (LTM) FAQ

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. posts a P/E ratio of 10.47. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 47.18. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Discretionary stocks, a P/E ratio near 47.18 is typical. LATAM Airlines Group S.A.'s 10.47 is lower that level. That is roughly 77.8% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.'s P/E ratio of 10.47 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for LTM's P/E ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 47.18), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; LATAM Airlines Group S.A.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging LATAM Airlines Group S.A. against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in P/E ratio easier to interpret. Start with 10.47 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.