BackGladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C Overview

Gladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C Long Term Debt

Gladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C's long-term debt is $480M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$480.73M
3.12% YoYΔ $-15.46M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Gladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C Long Term Debt History

Loading

Gladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Gladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Gladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C (LANDP) FAQ

Gladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C posts a long-term debt of $480M as of June 2026. That compares with $500M in the prior-year period — down 3.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Gladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C's long-term debt was $500M. The latest reading is $480M — a 3.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Gladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C's financial statement story. At $480M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LANDP's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Gladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Gladstone Land - 6% PRF PERPETUAL USD - Ser C against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $480M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.