Valuation check: LANDM's PEG ratio is -18.28, below the Finance sector average of 16.23.
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow-18.28
The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.
Gladstone Land - 5% PRF REDEEM 31/01/2026 USD 25 - Ser D (LANDM) currently reports a PEG ratio of -18.28. That is below the Finance sector average of 16.23. Use the charts on this page to explore Gladstone Land - 5% PRF REDEEM 31/01/2026 USD 25 - Ser D's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.
Gladstone Land - 5% PRF REDEEM 31/01/2026 USD 25 - Ser D's PEG ratio of -18.28 is lower than the Finance sector average of 16.23. That is roughly 212.6% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.
The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Gladstone Land - 5% PRF REDEEM 31/01/2026 USD 25 - Ser D's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At -18.28, LANDM can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Finance peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.
Start with the current PEG ratio of -18.28, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Finance average is 16.23. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Gladstone Land - 5% PRF REDEEM 31/01/2026 USD 25 - Ser D, and consider following LANDM for alerts when major investors trade the stock.
Gladstone Land - 5% PRF REDEEM 31/01/2026 USD 25 - Ser D is classified in the Finance sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows -18.28 versus a sector average near 16.23. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Finance are usually more informative than comparing LANDM with unrelated industries.