BackKatapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026) Overview

Katapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026) Net Tangible Assets

Katapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026)'s net tangible assets is $-8.1M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-8.13M
84.97% YoYΔ $45.94M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Katapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026) Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Katapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026) vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Katapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026) Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Katapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026) (KPLTW) FAQ

Katapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026) posts a net tangible assets of $-8.1M as of June 2026. That compares with $-54M in the prior-year period — up 85.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Katapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026)'s net tangible assets was $-54M. The latest reading is $-8.1M — a 85.0% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Katapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026)'s financial statement story. At $-8.1M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for KPLTW's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Katapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Katapult Holdings- Warrants (09/06/2026) against Real Estate peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Real Estate are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-8.1M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.