BackKHD Humboldt Wedag International AG Overview

KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG Profit Margin

Latest profit margin for KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG: 4.32% — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Profit Margin

3.97%
57.84% YoY

As of Dec 2025

Annual Profit Margin (TTM)

4.32%

Trailing 12 months ending Dec 2025

Average Profit Margin (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Profit Margin History

Loading

Profit Margin Comparison

Loading

Annual Profit Margin Growth Rate (%)

Loading

KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG (KHDHF) FAQ

KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG posts a profit margin of 4.32% as of December 2025. That is below the Materials sector average of 16.09%. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Materials stocks, a profit margin near 16.09% is typical. KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's 4.32% is lower that level. That is roughly 73.1% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's profit margin moves when the underlying profit, equity, or asset base changes. Cost cuts, pricing power, buybacks, write-downs, and cyclical swings can all shift the percentage. The latest reading is 4.32% as of December 2025; use YoY and peer views to separate noise from signal.

Context for KHDHF's profit margin usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 16.09%), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in profit margin easier to interpret. Start with 4.32% here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.