Innovator ETFs Trust - Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December (KDEC) has a ROE of 6.58%, below the Technology sector average of 57.49%.
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow6.58%
Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.
Innovator ETFs Trust - Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December (KDEC) currently reports a ROE of 6.58%. That is below the Technology sector average of 57.49%. Use the charts on this page to explore Innovator ETFs Trust - Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December's ROE history and peer comparisons.
Innovator ETFs Trust - Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December's ROE of 6.58% is lower than the Technology sector average of 57.49%. That is roughly 88.6% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.
There is no universal 'good' ROE, but Innovator ETFs Trust - Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December's current 6.58% should be judged against Technology norms (sector average: 57.49%) and against KDEC's own history. Strong, stable readings often indicate durable competitive advantage; volatile or declining ones deserve a closer look at margins and capital efficiency.
Start with the current ROE of 6.58%, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Technology average is 57.49%. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Innovator ETFs Trust - Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December, and consider following KDEC for alerts when major investors trade the stock.
Innovator ETFs Trust - Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December is classified in the Technology sector. On ROE, it currently shows 6.58% versus a sector average near 57.49%. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Technology are usually more informative than comparing KDEC with unrelated industries.